首页> 外文OA文献 >Detection probabilities of two introduced frogs in Hawaii: implications for assessing non-native species distributions
【2h】

Detection probabilities of two introduced frogs in Hawaii: implications for assessing non-native species distributions

机译:夏威夷两只引进青蛙的探测概率: 评估非本地物种分布的意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two nonnative Caribbean frogs, the Puerto Rican coqui and the Cuban greenhouse frog, recently invaded Hawaii. Because of its louder breeding call, management efforts have focused on the coqui, while little has been done to address the more cryptic greenhouse frog, even though it may be as widespread and have similar ecological impacts. The goal of this research was to determine the distribution and detection probability of both species on the island of Hawaii. We conducted a breeding call presence/absence survey at 446 sites every 2 km along major road networks. We re-surveyed 125 sites twice to determine detection and occupancy probabilities. Greenhouse frog detection probabilities (0.24, 0.29, 0.48, for each of the three visits, respectively) were lower than coqui detection probabilities (0.58, 0.73, 0.50, respectively) and increased with visits while those of the coqui did not. Greenhouse frog detection probabilities were lower in the presence of coquis for the first two surveys (0.12, 0.14) than in sites with greenhouse frogs alone (0.41), while greenhouse frogs had no effect on the detection of coquis. Site occupancy estimates for the greenhouse and coqui frog were 0.35 and 0.31, respectively, suggesting the species are similarly widespread. Results suggest multiple visits to sites are required to detect the greenhouse frog. Furthermore, results suggest that accounting for detectability is essential when determining the extent of invasion of cryptic species.
机译:最近有两只外来的加勒比海青蛙,波多黎各的库奎蛙和古巴的温室青蛙入侵了夏威夷。由于它发出的响亮的叫号声,管理工作集中在库奎岛上,尽管解决了这种隐秘的温室青蛙问题,尽管它可能同样广泛传播并具有相似的生态影响,却几乎没有采取任何措施。这项研究的目的是确定两种物种在夏威夷岛上的分布和检测概率。我们在主要道路网络上每2公里对446个地点进行了一次育种呼叫存在/不存在调查。我们两次对125个站点进行了重新调查,以确定检测和占用概率。温室蛙的检出概率(分别为3次探视中的每一次分别为0.24、0.29、0.48)低于coqui检出概率(分别为0.58、0.73、0.50),并随探视而增加,而coqui则没有。在前两次调查中,有库奎存在的温室蛙检出概率(0.12,0.14)低于仅有温室青蛙的场所(0.41),而温室蛙对库奎的检测没有影响。温室和蛙蛙的站点占用估计分别为0.35和0.31,这表明该物种的分布也类似。结果表明,需要多次访问站点才能检测到温室蛙。此外,结果表明,在确定隐性物种的入侵程度时,考虑可检测性至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号